Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0861420100140010073
Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
2010 Volume.14 No. 1 p.73 ~ p.77
The difference of Quantitative Analysis According to the Method of Region of Interest Setting in 99mTc-DMSA Renal Scan
Lee Jong-Hun

Shim Dong-Oh
Abstract
Purpose: The nuclear medicine technology has been changed. The hard ware is developed so much. Also the soft ware performs a meritorious deed for the development of nuclear medicine technology. We could use the automated region of interest (ROI) instead of manual ROI. We want to know that what difference of quantitative analysis is there between automated ROI and manual ROI

Materials and Methods: There are three experimental to make results. The first is what comparing the renal automated ROI and manual ROI. The second is that we compared three threshold ROI that size is difference each others with visible decision. The third is that we compared full, half, quarter automated background, and survey relative function.

Results: Although the first has statistically not significant difference, the second and third have significant difference. Threshold, setting smaller threshold then renal outline or bigger, has statistically significant difference (p<0.01). The third is performed with the first experimental. Full background has significant difference, comparing each three type background (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The results that there is not significant difference between automated ROI and manual ROI will increase objectivity and operator¡¯s convenience. We could know that smaller threshold then renal out line has significant difference in the second experimental. And the third experimental has results because of a increased background nearby live and spleen.
KEYWORD
99mTc-DMSA, Automated ROI, Threshold
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information